No Vanity Fair Cover

By February 1, 2011Nat-news

Natalie is featured in the upcoming issue of Vanity Fair, but surprisingly, while she is featured in the magazine, she didn’t make the expanded Hollywood issue cover.

Garcy says she heard that Natalie opted out due to her pregnancy, which is a shame. Hopefully the feature inside can make up for it.


Author Dazza

More posts by Dazza

Join the discussion 5 Comments

  • beatsbroken says:

    I’ve read a few different articles about this, and they all said Natalie dropped out because of her pregnancy. She presumably would have been where Anne Hathaway is.

    Is it ok to say that I’m actually really ok with this and slightly relieved?!? I mean, I would have loved to see her on the cover of VF… but not this cover. I don’t know what it is, but I do not like this at all. The only thing that I like about this is Mila….God she looks gorgeous! But the actual cover is boring. It’s just the same people they always have make facing like they are trying to hold their pee.

  • iluciouz says:

    originally the over was suppose to be Reynolds, Natalie and Franco but guess they put anne and jake to replace! it’s a nice cover but was looking forward to natalie on the cover!

  • jenr1215 says:

    that is a shame. least i can save $10

  • omgzrachel says:

    I’d be disappointed she declined if it weren’t a group photo. Zzzz…

  • clone says:

    not a very good pose for her age. I like how the other females are dressed and posing.more woman style.